David N. Dinkins Municipal Building
1 Centre Street 15th Floor North
New York, NY 10007
Email: gethelp@advocate.nyc.gov
Hotline: (212) 669-7250
*Our fax number has changed temporarily while we upgrade our infrastructureDecember 3rd, 2019Press Release
Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams today announced the creation of five Community Organizer positions within the Office of Public Advocate-- each focusing on designated issue-based areas to build coalitions for change-- as well as the organizers who will fill those roles. This is the latest in a series of organizational restructurings by Public Advocate Williams, designed to better serve New Yorkers across the city.
In announcing the appointments, Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams said, "When I first started working as a community organizer two decades ago-- before President Barack Obama -- people questioned what community organizing was and what organizers did. Since then, organizers across the city and nation have shown how this work creates change. Now, I'm excited to expand the organizing strength of this office to engage and uplift communities across our city, and for our new organizers to be agents of change."
The new Community Organizers work with local constituencies on grassroots campaigns across their specific area of focus, as well as conduct research on policy and legislation. They will implement campaigns and initiatives within these issue portfolios, working with advocacy groups and community-based organizations. The positions are designed in line with Public Advocate's activist-elected official strategy, community organizing background, and newly developed structure for the office.
Today's announcement comes after the previous appointments of Deputy Public Advocates, with each Community Organizer directly aligned with the Deputy Public Advocate's portfolios. The Community Organizers will work with the five Deputy Public Advocates in the areas of Housing Equity; Infrastructure and Environmental Justice; Justice, Health Equity and Safety; Education and Opportunity; and Civic and Community Empowerment.
The newly announced Community Organizers include:
Ivie Bien-Aime; Community Organizer of Housing Equity
Ivie is an experienced AmeriCorps V.I.S.T.A. Tenant Organizer and proudly steps into her role and responsibilities knowing that its goals are aligned with her passion to address New York City's crisis of housing insecurity. Ivie is a former Site Director of a COMPASS Elementary After School Program, and has previously held three Community Engagement positions with the NYC Department of Education as: School Based Parent Coordinator, District Family Advocate and Family Leadership Coordinator. Steve Fox; Infrastructure and Environmental Justice Steve comes to the Office of the Public Advocate after years organizing campaigns and consulting in the renewable energy sector. Before that, Steve organized and developed offices for the Community Voters Project, which registered over 165,000 African American and Latino voters in 6 states, focusing on states that had recently passed discriminatory voter ID laws. He has also actively organized campaigns related to overturning Citizens United and abolishing the death penalty. He is excited to combine his deep knowledge of energy and environmental policy with his deep passion for organizing for social justice in his new role. Keeshan Harley; Justice, Health Equity, and Safety Keeshan has fully dedicated the last 4 years of his life to community organizing and forwarding public policy in New York City. At Make the Road NY, he was active in city wide campaigns with young people around both Education and Policing reform. Keeshan has partnered with the Public Science Project at CUNY for a Participatory Action Research project called Researchers for Fair Policing and has given testimony to President Obama's 21st Century Policing Task force, and sat on the Mayoral Leadership Team around School Discipline. He will be taking on a range of issues from marijuana justice and Cure Violence and restorative justice programs to ending the school to prison pipeline, Elizabeth Kennedy; Education and Opportunity Elizabeth began her New York City career as a Human Rights Education Fellow with Amnesty International HQ, and went on to work as an Education Consultant with the Department of Education in the Office of Post-Secondary Readiness. Later, she led a national leadership program called GlobeChangers at Multiplying Good, and engaged in local and national community organizing with groups like NYCoRE, Housing Works, and the Center for Popular Democracy. She has also led diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging consulting work that supported nonprofits with sustainable training, leadership alignment, and strategic planning. Hadeel Mishal; Civic and Community Empowerment Hadeel is an activist and organizer from Bay Ridge who started her career organizing with young immigrants on Staten Island and teaching action civics courses to middle and high school students. She later accepted a fellowship through Newman's Own Foundation and moved to Philadelphia to organize with the Youth Leadership Council, working on local advocacy issues and awarding mini-grants to local organizations doing work align with their values. After completing her fellowship, Hadeel began working as a Youth Organizer at the Arab American Association of New York, engaging in city-wide advocacy and civic engagement initiatives.
December 2nd, 2019Press Release
Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams called for an end to the practice of solitary confinement today at a New York City Board of Corrections hearing. In testimony before the Board, he argued that "Solitary confinement is a torturous punishment that causes deep and permanent psychological, physical, and social harm." He further states that "It is an ineffective, counterproductive, and unsafe disciplinary practice that fails to address the underlying causes of problematic behavior. We must end solitary confinement in the City of New York now."
While the Board has currently proposed a rule regarding solitary that would reduce the maximum solitary sentence from thirty days to fifteen, among other gradual steps, the Public Advocate and other criminal justice reform leaders believe the practice of solitary must be entirely ended.
The Public Advocate's full testimony is below and can be downloaded here. TESTIMONY OF PUBLIC ADVOCATE JUMAANE D. WILLIAMS
TO THE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS
DECEMBER 2, 2019 Good morning, my name is Jumaane D. Williams and I am the Public Advocate for the City of New York. As the City's watchdog, it is my duty to protect the rights of all New Yorkers, including the roughly 7,000 New Yorkers who are housed in the Department of Correction (DOC) facilities. I'd like to thank the Board for holding this hearing and giving the public an opportunity to have their voices heard on this critically important proposed rule.
A member of my team testified at the Board's October 22nd meeting: Restrictive housing, punitive segregation, separation status, whatever we call it--solitary confinement is a torturous punishment that causes deep and permanent psychological, physical, and social harm. It is an ineffective, counterproductive, and unsafe disciplinary practice that fails to address the underlying causes of problematic behavior. We must end solitary confinement in the City of New York now.
The Board's rule must be revised to reflect this moral imperative. Fifteen days in solitary confinement is fifteen days too many. Through this rulemaking process, New York City has an opportunity to serve as a model for the nation in defending basic human rights. I call on the Board to fully end solitary confinement in New York City by adopting the comprehensive blueprint put forward by The NYC Jails Action Coalition and the #HALTsolitary Campaign.
As this blueprint makes clear, ending solitary confinement does not require a radical overhaul of existing protocols. In order to end this shameful chapter in our City's history, we need to strengthen existing standards and follow the example of previous efforts that have successfully replaced punitive segregation with alternatives that prioritize rehabilitation, health, safety, and basic human rights.
One specific example that I want to raise is the Clinical Alternative to Punitive Segregation (CAPS) program that has already been implemented in New York City jails for those living with serious mental illnesses. Instead of placing folks in solitary units that only exacerbate existing behavioral problems, this program provides intense programming, out of cell time, therapy and recreation activities. This has resulted in improved outcomes and safety, including a significant decrease in self-harm and injury. The success of CAPS should not be confined to those with serious mental illnesses. This approach can and should be applied for all New Yorkers in DOC facilities.
I'll end by saying that the stakes are too high here for this City to be taking half-measures and exploiting bureaucratic loopholes that continue the practice of solitary confinement. Passing emergency variances for so-called "separation status", issuing substitution orders to send young New York City residents to sit in solitary cells upstate, and capitulating to watered down rules like the ones before us today are how we end up with more tragedies like the preventable deaths of Layleen Polanco and Kalief Browder. We can and we must end solitary confinement in New York City, and I implore the Board to revise and pass rules that will make this happen.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
November 29th, 2019Press Release
Following the Public Campaign Financing Commission's final vote on its controversial plan for implementation of a public financing system in New York State, The Albany Times-Union has published an op-ed by Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams entitled 'Campaign finance reform was designed to fail.'
In the piece, he argues that the Commission's failure to develop a real plan for fairly financed elections, and its success in developing one which damages minor parties, was a deliberate action by those in power- and that legislators need to act to correct "what would be the among the worst public financing systems in the nation."
Text of the op-ed is available below and can be viewed online here.
'Campaign finance reform was designed to fail' By Jumaane D. Williams
Our state's Public Campaign Finance Commission raised its voices over the shouts of enraged New Yorkers on Monday to finalize its plan for implementing a public financing system. The commission was ostensibly tasked with creating a system of fairly financed elections, and in that mission they failed. It's not a fairly financed election if contribution limits are still high enough for the wealthiest donors to outbid New Yorkers for a politician's attention. It's not a fairly financed election if it includes a poison pill to destroy minor parties that push for major change. It's not a fairly financed election if donation thresholds are inflated enough that the program functions as an incumbency protection program - defeating the purpose, not the powerful. But the truth is that the commission's failure to implement a fair system isn't a failure at all - it's by design. Governor Cuomo-- like too many of his allies in office-- knows that a fairly financed election is one they can't win. This planned failure has been seeded from the beginning- by installing his top ally as Chair, Governor Cuomo has been able to abuse this process for political gain, free of consequence. It's absurd, Trumpian, and largely unseen by the public this system should serve and uplift. The commission held hearings, but clearly weren't listening. In 2018, the top 100 donors gave more money than 137,000 small donors combined. This plan won't suitably correct that disparity - but, in another move that undercuts and obfuscates the purpose of the commission, it will target the organizations working to fight it. I wouldn't be in office without public financing. But I also wouldn't be here without minor parties, who are unafraid to take a stance against powers like Governor Cuomo. I wouldn't be here without grassroots individuals with boundless energy but limited funds, whose voices public financing would amplify, who big money wants to drown out. Without those forces I wouldn't be here. And the Governor knows that. Advocates, legislators, leaders, know we had an opportunity to uplift the voices of all New Yorkers, and we cannot stop raising our voices - and votes - against what would be among the worst public financing systems in the nation. Legislators need to return to Albany and fight back against entrenched powers, or voters will themselves - because elected officials who don't support fair elections don't deserve to win them.
November 26th, 2019Press Release
The New York City Council today passed legislation from Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams aimed at combating the use of fraudulent parking permits in New York City, alongside a package of eight other related measures. The Public Advocate's legislation, Intro 596-B, would increase the fine for use of unauthorized or fraudulent city-issued parking permits, or placards, from $250 to $500.
"Placard abuse is egregious across New York City, and its damaging impact can be seen on side streets and avenues in all five boroughs," said Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams. "The effects of placard corruption are not just an inconvenience, but a danger and a misuse of our roadways. While the city has been incredibly concerned with combatting fair evasion, placard abuse amounts to a significant theft in transportation services, and this is an effort to address that beyond just words. Doubling the penalty for such blatant fraudulent actions will serve as a strong deterrent to this abuse."
Placards are intended for usage by qualifying staff of city agencies, non-profit organizations, people with disabilities, and clergy members. In addition to street congestion, abuses of that system result in blocking bus, pedestrian, fire hydrant, and biking passages. There have been over 8,000 complaints to 311 in the last two years, and the use of fraudulent placards is currently punishable with a fine of no less than $250.
This bill, part of a broader package the Council voted on today, would double the penalty for the offense, specifically targeting those who manufacture, purchase, or otherwise use fraudulent permits. Enforcement for this violation is primarily carried out by the NYPD. Among other bills in the package passed today are bills which would create an electronic tracking system for valid parking permits, expand reporting and enforcement on illegal placard and city vehicle usage, and penalize individuals who are misusing otherwise legitimate permits.
Advocates, including those on social media, have long called for reform and enforcement on this issue, in a sustained campaign of sharing photographs and videos of prominent examples of placard abuse and illegal parking with elected officials and the public.
November 25th, 2019Press Release
"The Public Campaign Financing Commission's plan voted on today will not empower people through Fair Elections-- instead, it will protect the people in power. The commission may have held hearings, but it's clear they weren't listening.
"In 2018, the top 100 donors gave more money than all 137,000 small donors combined. That's absurd, and the plan that Governor Cuomo and Jay Jacobs have successfully pushed through will not do nearly enough to change a system that gives the wealthiest people control. Many of today's proposals and specific votes appeared to be at the Governor's behest. New York's 'progressive' Governor and his allies are showing their true colors and engaging in a Trumpian abuse of this process.
"Advocates, legislators, leaders, know that we had an opportunity to create a public financing system that uplifts the voices of all New Yorkers, but as it stands, it will instead serve as an incumbency protection program, a clear attack on the progressive left movement in this state which supporters of these actions are complicit in.
"In light of today's outcome, legislators should return to Albany ahead of the deadline to amend the plan that would put in place public financing in letter, but undermine its spirit with one of the worst systems in the nation."
November 20th, 2019Press Release
Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and Council Member Brad Lander released the following statement in response to an Executive Order issued by Mayor Bill de Blasio establishing an Algorithms Management and Policy Officer, tasked with ensuring that city agencies develop algorithms in ways that promote fairness and accountability, but creates a potential loophole for law enforcement agencies.
"Data-driven decision-making has the power to totally transform how government allocates resources and serves people, for better or for worse. The algorithms being used to decide everything from where kids go to school, to who can get public assistance, and which neighborhoods are allocated more police attention must be assessed for equity and bias, else we risk recreating ingrained patterns of discrimination and inequality.
"We know from our work fighting to pass the Community Safety Act that structures for oversight and accountability are critical to reforming ingrained patterns in our policing. That's why we are so disappointed to learn that under the new reporting requirements, law enforcement officials would have the potential ability to exempt certain data without specific justifiable cause.
"Decades of racially discriminatory policing have left us with troves of biased data that continue to inform today's predictive policing algorithms, creating feedback loops that recreate harmful overpolicing in communities of color. Policies like stop, question and frisk taught us that institutionalized bias is hard to shake, and harder still when bias is masked by seemingly neutral calculations.
“New York has the opportunity to lead the way on ensuring equity, fairness, and accountability over algorithmic decision-making. We welcome the creation of the Officer of Algorithms Management and Policy, which can help us ensure that we are taking seriously the need for transparency and accountability in how algorithms work, what data they use to make decisions, and how they impact people. There cannot be an exemption for law enforcement, so we ask the administration to provide clarification and necessary change."